We've already discussed the ABO system in human blood. But there's more
to it than that.
What about the Rh (Rhesus) factor? This is the "+" or "-" label on your
blood, and it indicates either the presence ("+") or absence ("-") of the
"Rhesus factor" protein on your red blood cells.
Hemoglobin breakdown products from destroyed red blood cells can cause death or
serious damage to the fetus, and babies may be born with severe anemia and
an inability to obtain sufficient oxygen.
In cases of known risk, a physician will sometimes prescribe drugs to
suppress the mother's immune system until after the birth. Not great for
her or the baby, but possibly better than the alternative.
Moving on to other species...
COAT COLOR IN MAMMALS
At least five different genes, each with two or more alleles, interact to determine the
coat color of mice, and it is believed that similar genes may exist in other mammals.
The S locus - controls presence or absence of white patches
(piebalding)
Another example of codominance at yet another coat color gene, H: Coat color in horses and cattle.
- The H allele is one of many affecting mammal hair color.
- H1 allele: red hair shaft
- H2 allele: white hair shaft
- H1H1: chestnut
- H2H2: white
- H1H2: roan
EXAM I MATERIAL STOPS HERE!
THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL WILL BE COVERED ON EXAM II
MULTIPLE ALLELES
Some genes have more than two alleles,
and not all the alleles have equal dominance/recessiveness.
Example: coat color in mammals as shown above for gene "C" In this
case...
agouti (C) > chinchilla (silver) cch
> Himalayan (ch) > albino (ca)
Another Example: white chevron pattern in
Clover (Trifolium sp.).
LETHAL ALLELES
Certain alleles, when present in homozygous
recessive condition, cause inviability/death of the homozygous individual.
By definition, the gene that has mutated is said to be an ESSENTIAL GENE, since
its "demise" causes death of the organism that doesn't get its product.
EXAMPLES:
- dwarfing gene in rabbits
- yellow coat color in mice
- manx allele in cats
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- Tay Sachs disease
- cystic fibrosis
GENE INTERACTIONS THAT PRODUCE POLYMORPHISMS IN WILD POPULATIONS
Genes can interact to produce modified F2 dihybrid phenotypic ratios.
We've already seen this in the case of chicken comb shape, but here are a
few more examples...
Let's have a look at skin color in Corn snakes (Elaphe guttata). Two pigments are
involved, each manufactured by a different set of enzymes.
PENETRANCE AND EXPRESSIVITY
Environment plays an important role in gene expression.
In the genes we have studied so far, a mutation is expressed:
- if dominant, in either the homozygous or heterozygous condition
- if recessive, only if present in homozygous condition
THIS IS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE
PENETRANCE
is the proportion of individuals with a specific genotype who
manifest that genotype at the phenotypic level. (Some individuals may not
express a gene if modifiers, epistatic genes or suppressors are also
present in the genome, which thwart expression.
Penetrance = 1.0 (100%) when all homozygous recessive individuals express
the recessive form of the allele, and all homozygous dominant individuals
and heterozygous individuals express the alternate form of the allele.
Penetrance < 1.0 if *not* all homozygous recessive individuals express the
recessive allele.
EXAMPLES:
- Brachydactyly (short digits) in humans
- Neurofibromatosis in humans (disease causes tumorlike growths to appear
all over the surface of the body, if it is fully expressed.
EXPRESSIVITY
is the degree to which a particular genotype is
expressed in the phenotype of a particular individual. (That is,
phenotype
may be altered by heterogeneity of other genes which affect the expression
of the particular locus in question, or by environmental
influence.)
EXAMPLES:
Neurofibromatosis (as described above): This can vary in expressivity
from a few "cafe au lait" spots on the skin, to
actual tumorlike growths known as
neurofibromas which may cover the skin,
to severe cases with major skeletal abnormalities.
(NOTE: Although the made famous by the David Lynch movie, "The Elephant
Man," Joseph Merrick, the protagonist of that story, did not have
neurofibromatosis. In fact, medical scientists today are not exactly
certain what caused his bizarre phenotype.
Another example of variable expressivity:
Piebald spotting in beagles (and some other mammals): dogs who have the
same genotype for the piebald locus often express various patterns and
total coverage of white fur patches.
Thus, PENETRANCE describes what happens in a population, and
EXPRESSIVITY describes what happens in a particular individual.
INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT CAN ALSO AFFECT THE EXPRESSION OF GENES.
AGE DEPENDENT EXPRESSION
As an organism passes through its life cycle, the expression of its genes
changes. This means that some genes are not expressed until later in
life.
Examples:
Huntington's disease (age usu. 30 or over)
Male pattern baldness (age usu. 20 or over)
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (age 2-5)
SEX-DEPENDENT EXPRESSION
In sex-influenced traits, expression varies depending on the sex of the
individual
carrying the alleles.
e.g. - finger length (we already did this one)
In other cases, autosomal genes cause the expression of a trait ONLY in
one gender or the other (sex-limited traits).
Examples of sex-limited traits:
- horns in some mammals
- lactation in female mammals
- ovaries in females; testes in males
- various secondary sex characteristics
PHENOCOPIES
In some instances, an environmental factor can mimic the effect of a
mutation, if the factor is present during a critical point in
development.
EXAMPLES:
Presence of rubella virus during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy in humans
can mimic the phenotypic effects of certain rare, recessive alleles (at
several different loci) which can cause deafness, cataracts and defects in
cardiac development.
Thalidomide (a drug administered in the 1950's to woman at risk of
miscarriage) mimicked a rare mutation causing a disorder known as
phocomelia--failure of the long bones of the limbs to develop. (Note that
thalidomide did NOT produce a phenocopy effect in the test mammal,
Rattus norvegicus!)
The formation of birth defects due to environmental
agents (viruses, chemicals, etc.) is known as TERATOGENESIS.
EPIGENESIS
Still largely unexplained, but possibly due to parental imprinting of the
DNA. This phenomenon occurs when
phenotypic alterations occur without change to the DNA sequence, and yet these
phenotypic changes are heritable!
EXAMPLE: Pigmentation in Biston betularia.
If you missed class, you missed the campfire story told by Dr. Krempels
about why you just can't always trust dogma.
These phenomena, in combination, can really confuse the issue when it
comes to interpreting phenotypic ratios in cohorts or trying to analyze a
human pedigree!
Bottom line: It is important to remember that the impact of a gene at the
phenotypic level depends not only on its dominance/recessiveness, but also
on the modifying effects of other parts of the genome and on the internal
and external environment's impact on expression.
This brings us to the not-all-that-age-old question:
Which is more
important in the formation of the organism, Nature (genotype) or Nurture
(environment)?
The answer may turn out to be....IT DEPENDS.
It seems (at least so far) that the genotype "sets the limits" for a
particular organism's phenotypic potential. The environment works on the
plasticity of expression to produce different phenotypes from similar
genotypes. This is evident even in identical twins.